목차 Argument 1 Argument 2 Argument
3 Conclusion
본문 Regarding this event, Ryan Calo
said
“When you have an I.P.O.(initial public offering) you don’t want
investors to be skeptical or jittery(신경질적인, 초조해하는),” “In order for you to be
as valuable as possible, you want to make sure the seas are calm. This calms the
seas.”
Ryan Calo is a Research Fellow at the Stanford Law School Center
for Internet and Society. He also runs the Consumer Privacy Project and
writes and lectures about robotics, including issues of liability and
privacy.
Basically, what he is saying is Facebook now have an
IPO which is initial public offering, and they do not want to make their
investors uncomfortable by getting involved in sensitive matters like a privacy
issue. So Facebook will work on privacy matters and obviously not risk their
profit for users privacy.
This is the end of my part and 가람 will
continue our argument regarding Analysis based on Export Sourcing and
anology.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/technology/facebook-agrees-to-ftc-settlement-on-privacy.html
본문내용 cebook’s
Data Use Policy
FTC Settlement
Expert Sourcing Ryan
Calo Researcher at Stanford Law School Center for Internet and
Society
Argument 2
Argument 3 “The relationship between
Facebook and its users is like friendship”
Others interested in B’s
Secret People Interested in User Privacy (advertisement company) Child
B Users Child A Facebook B’s Secret User
Privacy Toy Profit
Conclusion
Re
참고문헌 Icrossing The
total active Facebook user number statistics Digital Marketing
agency Emarketer Display advertisement revenues percentage for top 5- ad
selling companies
Internet World Stats Facebook growth statistics for
2011-2012
Moneycontrol.com |
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기