목차 Position 1: For Teacher Responsibility Position 2: For Increased Academic Freedom
본문 Academic Freedom은, -University-level scholars 에게만 적용. -Below university-level scholars는 traditional teacher’s responsibility만 가짐.
범위를 벗어난 Academic Freedom은, 1. Educationally disruptive behavior을 야기 ->Academic freedom doesn’t mean a teacher’s freedom to impose one’s views on students. 2. Intellectual Crime이 될 가능성 ->Influencing students to think or act in certain ways can be another form of crime.
선생님의 역할은 어디까지 허용되어야 하는가? 1. 교사의 사회적 책임 ->Teachers should fulfill the duty of developing students to become positive and productive citizens. 2. 교사의 학생들에 대한 책임 ->Teachers should help students develop habits of thinking(learning ideas, attitudes, behaviors, etc.) since children lack the ability to decide what is proper and improper. 3. 교사의 직업에 대한 책임 ->Teachers should not go beyond the basic responsibility of teaching profession which is to teach social values and knowledge to students.
본문내용 ow university-level scholars는 traditional teacher’s responsibility만 가짐. 범위를 벗어난 Academic Freedom은, 1. Educationally disruptive behavior을 야기 ->Academic freedom doesn’t mean a teacher’s freedom to impose one’s views on students. 2. Intellectual Crime이 될 가능성 ->Influencing students to think or act in certain ways can be another form of crime. 선생님의 역할은 어디까지 허용되어야 하는가? 1. 교사의 사회적 책임 ->Teachers shoul |
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기